Financial health of local authorities

March 8, 2018

The financial health of local authorities across England is getting worse, according to a report from the National Audit Office.

The report highlights that despite greater freedoms to increase council tax bills and one-off short-term funds from Government, local authorities are struggling to juggle higher demands and cost pressures against significant central government funding cuts of nearly 50% since 2010-11.

Many local authorities are relying on using their savings to fund local services and are overspending on services, which is not financially sustainable. The report goes on to show that if local authorities with social care responsibilities keep using their reserves at current rates, one in ten could have exhausted them within three years.

Last month, Northamptonshire County Council imposed strict in-year spending controls as it is at risk of spending more than the resources it has available in 2017-18, which would be unlawful.

Continued increases in demand for social care and tightening resources are pushing local government towards a narrow remit centred on social care. From 2010-11 to 2016-17, the estimated number of people aged 65 and over in need of care increased by 14.3%, and the number of children being looked-after grew by 10.9%. Social care now accounts for 54.4% of local authorities’ total service spend, up from 45.3% in 2010-11.

Despite growing demand, spending on social care still fell by 3.0% from 2010-11 to 2016-17. However, this compares with a 32.6% reduction in spending on all other service areas including:

  • Reductions of 52.8% on planning and development.
  • 45.6% on housing services.
  • 37.1% on highways and transport.
  • 34.9% on cultural and related services.

There is further evidence that these spending reductions are impacting frontline services. Since 2010-11, 33.7% fewer households have their waste collected at least weekly, the number of bus miles subsidised by local authorities outside London has fallen by 48.4%, and the number of libraries has reduced by 10.3%.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has made improvements in understanding the sector’s financial position since the NAO’s last report in 2014 but, because responsibility for services is spread across departments, there is no single view of how funding cuts are impacting the whole of local authority services.

At a time when social care spending is being prioritised by local authorities, failing to understand how funding and demand pressures affect the full range of local authority activities risks unintentionally reducing services to a core offering centred on social care.

The Government has given local government several short-term cash injections in recent years, but most of this funding has only been available for adult social care. Uncertainty remains over the long-term financial plan for the sector. The Government has confirmed its intention to implement the results of the Fair Funding Review in 2020-21 and to allow local authorities to retain 75% of business rates, but the implications of these changes for local authorities’ finances are not yet clear.

Amyas Morse, Head of the National Audit Office, said, 'Current funding for local authorities is characterised by one off and short-term fixes, many of which come with centrally driven conditions. This restricts the capacity of local authorities and yet the weight of responsibility to respond to increased demand and maintain services remains very much on their shoulders. The Government risks sleep-walking into a centralised local authority financial system where the scope for local discretion is being slowly eroded.'

Responding to the report, Margaret Willcox, President of the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services said, 'Social care is an essential support for us when we are older or disabled. Local government knows this because it knows its local communities. So despite the stark reality of the biggest cuts in public services, it has prioritised its citizens with the greatest needs.

'However, local councils have had to make terribly difficult decisions that mean that fewer people get the trusted care they need, care providers are closing homes, while in some parts of the country there are no home carers to get people safely home from hospital.

'Councils wisely spent £1 billion in emergency government funding last year to address the risk of failure, which is reflected in fewer delayed transfers of care. But people are living longer and costs are rising, including the welcome National Living Wage.

'Adult social care simply cannot continue with short-term fixes. There are more than a million people with unmet need, with around a third of these coping with loneliness much or all of the time. Councils’ ability to prioritise prevention measures – key to long-term savings to the public purse – are being impacted due to funding pressures.

'Government needs to grasp the nettle and talk with all of us as responsible citizens about how we value our needs for care and support and how we pay for it, not just for next winter but also in 25 years’ time.'


Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of