post image

Into Perspective: Local Authorities

This issue, Into Perspective shares insights from the 11th annual State of Local Government Finance in England 2024 report. CMM hears from a law firm looking at the legal consequences of councils slashing their adult social care budgets and a leading care provider discussing how local authorities are stuck between a rock and a hard place with their finances. 

What risks face local authorities planning to cut their adult social care budgets? 

In a new report titled The State of Local Government Finance in England 2024, the Local Government Information Unit (LGIU) has revealed that 51% of senior council figures warn their councils are likely to declare effective bankruptcy in the next parliament unless local government funding is reformed, with a further 9% saying they are likely to go bankrupt in the next financial year. Just 4% of council respondents had confidence in the sustainability of local government finance, while only 6% are happy with the Government’s performance on understanding the scale of the problem facing council finances.  

Nine out of 10 respondents said their councils are raising council tax, and the same proportion are increasing fees and charges. At the same time, two thirds of councils are cutting spending on services, meaning that services are getting more expensive for most residents at the same that they are being cut. For councils with responsibility for social care, the survey found that adults and children’s social care together make up the most serious long-term pressure, with 52% of council respondents saying adult social care was the greatest long-term pressure and 16.2% of councils planning on cutting adult social care.  

According to the report, high inflation, alongside rising need for council services, has compounded the impact of central Government funding cuts. Even for councils that manage to balance the books, there are concerns that some services they provide may fall below legal standards, which will continue unabated without costly legal challenges. 

Respondents to the survey called for a reform of social care, saying the reserves they are using to survive will soon deplete, while others called for more investment in preventative activities ‘which would reduce the pressure on our services – particularly regarding adult social care and children, in the medium to long term’. 

The report declares it ‘unsurprising’ that the greatest long-term pressure is split between adult social care and children’s services, when ‘the proportion of upper tier budgets which go on these services are considered’. One respondent said, ‘Four percent of the population use social care, which is 70% of our budget – and you wonder why residents are not happy the place doesn’t look spotless and potholes need to be filled. Residents are not happy their council tax goes on so few. Social care needs reform.’ 

Jonathan Carr-West, Chief Executive of the LGIU, said, ‘We have long warned that a lack of funding combined with inflation and rising need for adult and children’s social care, homelessness, and SEND services has pushed councils to the brink. 

‘This year’s State of Local Government Finance report reveals the desperate, ruinous financial situation councils find themselves in. Cutting services, borrowing more money and spending reserves year after year is completely unsustainable. Citizens are being failed. 

‘With over half of councils warning us they are at risk of bankruptcy within the next parliament, it is no longer possible to blame individual governance issues. There clearly is a systemic issue and rather than bunging local government panicked injections of cash, whoever wins the next election will need to reform the entire system, bringing back
multi-year settlements based on an area’s need and developing new ways of revenue raising.’ 

Local authorities have a duty of care
 

Providers of adult social care services have been expected to do more with less for years now and so it is no surprise that councils are continuing to slash budgets. Providers remain sitting in the eye of a perfect storm with escalating staff costs, energy bills and mortgage rates adding pressure to their operations. Although the initial shock of the cost-of-living crisis has eased, providers are reflecting carefully on how they spend money and reinvest it back into their own businesses.  

Councils need to understand that failure to pay appropriate fees means that providers may not be able to cover the costs of day-to-day essentials (for example, expensive electronic care systems, advanced training or activities). This will inevitably result in some providers trying to cut corners – not out of choice but necessity. Is that really the best way to provide care to vulnerable people? Local authorities need to realise they have a duty of care to the people they place into care services and that placements they commission should be properly funded. To fail to do so increases risk. 

Ironically, the reduction or stagnation of fees could ultimately result in an increase in local authority quality monitoring and safeguarding activity if providers are forced to work to reduced budgets. This would not only be a false economy and more costly from an expenditure perspective but – more importantly – will have an adverse impact on service users (not to mention the public’s view of local authorities more generally).  

A further risk to local authorities is the increased scrutiny by the CQC. The regulator is now obliged to review how councils discharge their duty in line with the Care Act 2014 and, in my opinion, this should absolutely include how services are funded and how a local authority’s refusal to pay an appropriate fee impacts on vulnerable people.  

Jenny Wilde, Partner, Acuity Law. 

X: @AcuityLaw 

Email: [email protected] 

 

A long-term trend of rationing adult social care
  

The scale of collapse in the care sector is unparalleled. Unmet need, care withdrawal, underinvestment, disinvestment, commissioning backlog and unimaginable hardship witnessed begs many questions for local authorities. Councils are caught between Care Act responsibilities, ambitions, people needing support and dependency on central Government.  

Councils have strict obligations under the Care Act 2014 and face increasing demand. Guidance was designed to promote wellbeing, assess and meet people’s needs, achieve the outcomes most important to them, help them retain or regain skills and confidence and prevent increased need or delay deterioration. 

In 2023, there were 30,090 fewer people receiving long-term care, a fall of 4.6%, yet requests for support grew by 10.6%, reflecting a long-term trend of rationing adult social care. Simon Bottery, Senior Fellow, Social Care at The Kings Fund, suggested that social care has got worse since Government pledged to ‘fix’ it in 2019.  

He outlined eight key problems, which are now worse: 

  • Due to a decade of freezing eligibility thresholds, adult social care has increasingly stringent means tests, restricting access to services.  
  • The £86,000 cap on lifetime care costs has been postponed and may never be implemented. 
  • 1.6 million older people aren’t getting the support they need as local authority budgets struggle.  
  • There are increasing concerns about quality, illustrated by examples of 15-minute care visits in home care and fears of abuse and neglect in care homes. 
  • Although the CQC has regained powers to audit local authorities, it’s not clear what impact this has had, in light of financial difficulties and diminishing care provision. 
  • Staff shortages in adult social care, with more challenges ahead with recent Government immigration changes. 
  • The market is increasingly fragile. Many social care providers have handed back contracts or closed because the rates paid by local authorities for care are too low.  
  • Plans to get the health and care ‘system’ working better together have struggled to materialise. The reality remains that underfunded social care lacks influence over NHS-dominated structures.  

Geoffrey Cox, Managing Director, Southern Healthcare (Wessex) Ltd.  

X: @geoffreydcox 

Email: [email protected] 


What is your experience of working with your local authority? Leave a comment on this article or join the conversation to share your thoughts. 

About Jenny Wilde

Jenny is a Partner in Acuity Law’s Healthcare and Regulatory teams. Having qualified and practiced for over a decade at Ridouts, Jenny is an expert in health and social care regulatory law. She repr…

Read More

esents care providers in challenges to inspection reports and regulatory enforcement actions. Jenny is highly experienced in advising clients on safeguarding investigations and serious case reviews, a s well as inquests, criminal prosecutions and commissioning fee disputes.

About Geoffrey Cox

Geoffrey is Managing Director of Southern Healthcare which runs four Devon Nursing Homes. Geoffrey is also a Registered Nursing Homes Association (RNHA) and Devon Care Providers Collaborative Director…

Read More

and is keen to share learning, promote best practice and help develop a more balanced, positive and futuristic narrative for social care. Geoffrey completed a master’s degree in Dementia studies at Stirling University in 2013 and his homes specialise in Dementia nursing.

Related Content

The best defence is compliance: The duty of care in adult social care

Immigration law update: Assessing the impact

Pick and mixed: Making social care sweet for all

Into Perspective: Community engagement

Into Perspective: Technology

Into Perspective: Social Care Nursing

Into Perspective: Activities in care settings

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted